Factual record. No finding of causation or responsibility is made here.
The family’s roadworks investigation
Lethal road works
The family’s description and questions
Factual record. No finding of causation or responsibility is made here.
The bank and road edge
The 1 May photographs matter because they preserve a later view of the road edge. They do not, by themselves, tell us when the bank was cut or what happened on the collision night.
Close-up of the bank and material at the road edge, described by the family as clay. Cropped from the family’s 1 May 2025 photograph. Open full-size photographFull context viewContext view of the left-hand roadside excavation/open line; drainage function unproven. Open full-size photographFull context viewExposed blue pipe opening beside the road, on the right in this view. Frame from the family’s 1 May 2025 walkthrough. Open full-size photographFull context viewCloser view of the roadside channel and exposed soil. Screen controls cropped; original retained. Open full-size photographWider view of the roadside channel and bend. Black screenshot bars removed; vehicle registration obscured for privacy. Open full-size photograph
A later view
The family photograph set shows an exposed bank beside the approach, a visible drainage or pipe feature and the road edge in the condition recorded on 1 May 2025. The images should be read with their verified subject, location and original metadata, not by filename alone.
That later view is useful comparison evidence. It can be placed beside the July 2024 imagery and the formal road records, but it cannot silently become a dated construction certificate.
The grass question
The family estimates that the visible regrowth may represent approximately five days of grass growth. That is a family estimate about what the regrowth looked like, not a claim that the photographs were taken five days after the crash. The calendar interval from 24 April to 1 May is seven days.
No botanical method, species identification, baseline photograph, measured growth rate or site-specific model is held here. The estimate therefore remains inconclusive. It may justify asking for dated works records; it cannot date the works on its own.
Safe reading
The careful public description is that the photographs show the bank and drainage features on 1 May, and that the family reads the regrowth as a reason to investigate an earlier disturbance. Whether that disturbance pre-dated 24 April remains an evidence question.
A useful comparison should preserve the same camera direction, fixed landmarks and original file metadata. It should not infer trench depth, soil composition, pipe age or road contamination from colour or shape alone. Those details belong to the dated project and scene records still being sought.
The page therefore keeps the visual evidence valuable without asking it to answer a question it cannot answer. A later image can show a later condition clearly while the work date remains open.
Scroll horizontally to read this table.
Bank and road-edge comparison
Work element
How a controlled operation should be managed
What the available records and images can and cannot establish
Records to review
Bank face and temporary stability
Set out the approved limits and temporary bank geometry; use the designed batter, bench, toe/crest treatment or temporary protection; inspect changes in ground and weather conditions.
The later images show an exposed-looking bank surface and loose material in the photographed view. They do not establish angle, soil classification, stability, duration, design or whether the condition was unsafe.
Approved drawings/cross-sections; method statement and risk assessment; competent-person or geotechnical assessment; dated site diary and before/during/after photographs.
Runoff from the bank
Map clean-water diversion, dirty-water interception, settlement/filtering and the stable outfall. Keep the live lane and adjacent property protected from uncontrolled flow and repair controls when the plan requires it.
Rain can mobilise exposed material in general, but the held rainfall and photographs do not prove that soil reached the carriageway, when it moved, or what route it took.
Drainage sketch and levels; outfall ownership; rainfall-trigger entries; inspection and corrective-action sheets; inlet/outfall photographs; complaints or incident log.
Spoil and loose material
Define where excavated material is stored or removed, keep spoil clear of traffic and drainage paths, and record end-of-shift housekeeping and any weather response.
Material visible near a road edge is an observation about that image, not proof of its source, quantity, duration, contamination, movement or effect on vehicle grip.
Cover, stabilise or otherwise control exposed earth while open; protect the toe and outfall; inspect after the work plan's weather/site trigger and document repair.
A later bare or vegetated appearance cannot show whether controls existed earlier, whether a face was unfinished, or whether erosion occurred.
Temporary-works design; erosion/silt-control schedule; material delivery records; inspection logs; weather and repair entries; completion photographs.
Road-edge and overlay interface
Survey the existing edge, record any reseal or verge interface, reset drainage inlets where the approved scope requires it, and confirm the final edge is stable and maintainable.
An apparent boundary between seal and earth in a photograph does not identify the scheme, date, specification, or whether an inlet was included in the same job.
Road-management work order; chainage and drawings; resurfacing/overlay records; inlet inspection; as-built or handback record.
End-of-day condition
Reduce the exposed footprint; remove loose spoil from the route; secure the bank and drainage; record who inspected the site and what remained for the next shift.
An image taken in daylight cannot prove the overnight arrangement, the inspection frequency or the absence of controls outside the frame.
The appointed competent role should sign design/temporary-work hold points, record deviations and weather decisions, issue corrective instructions and verify close-out within the actual contract and appointment.
The held material does not establish who made the relevant design, inspection or handback decisions.
Appointment and delegated authority; design checks; hold-point releases; non-conformance/instruction records; change control; handover and maintenance plan.
The open channel beside the road
Two family-supplied views show the roadside channel and road edge at the bend. No barrier is visible between the channel and the road in the photographed section.
Capture date not confirmed. “Left” describes these views, not Bronagh’s direction of travel.
Was this a permanent drain or an excavation still in progress? What protection, signs and inspections were specified? Could water or erosion have affected the road edge?
These are questions for the works records and an engineering assessment, not findings from photographs.
Regulation 55 addresses suitable barriers or secure covers for an accessible excavation, shaft, pit or opening near work where a fall liable to cause personal injury is possible. Regulation 97 is a separate roadwork provision addressing guarding, lighting, traffic signs and supervision where its roadwork trigger is met. The two provisions have different triggers, and the photographs do not establish which, if either, applied to this feature or work phase.
Capping gone. The Council's inspection recorded it, 93 days before Bronagh died.
21 January 2025: Tipperary County Council's engineering inspection rated Killardry Bridge "Significant Damage", capping "partly removed", signage "No". Bronagh died at the bridge on 24 April 2025.
Council engineering inspection, 21 January 2025 · Family photograph
1 of 11
The grass verge, grown level with the lowered wall.
The family's view: where the verge has grown level with the lowered wall, it forms a ramp onto it. The record does not establish who formed the verge, or when.
Family photograph, February 2026
1 of 11
The drainage pipe at the bank.
The Council's review says the only drainage work on this road was cleaning the verge inlets. The family's timeline puts this pipe about ten days before the collision; its view: it cannot drain the road.
Family photograph, 1 May 2025 · Council internal-review decision, 18 February 2026
1 of 11
Clay and stones from the open bank, on the tarmac.
Photographed 1 May 2025, a week after Bronagh died. The bank was left open; wet material from it is sitting on the road surface where cars pass.
Family photograph, 1 May 2025
1 of 11
An open channel beside the bend.
An open channel along the roadside at the bend, photographed 1 May 2025. The family's view: it was left open with no barrier or warning sign. The photograph does not show when it was dug.
Family photograph, 1 May 2025
1 of 11
The long open bank on the approach, the night it rained.
24 April 2025: Toureen's rainfall day recorded 21.5 mm (including hours after the collision). The family's view: this open earth bank, on the right driving to the bridge, destroys the road beside it in rain.
Met Éireann, Toureen, rainfall day 24 April 2025 · Family photograph
1 of 11
Facing the bridge: the approach meets it at 90 degrees.
The Council's 2014 inspection records the approach skew at 90 degrees and a 4.8-metre carriageway; its January 2025 bridge inspection recorded signage "No". The turn she had to make is ahead.
Eirspan principal inspection, 4 March 2014 · Council engineering inspection, 21 January 2025 · Family photograph
1 of 11
Imagine this road at night, in heavy rain.
The family's view: in the dark and heavy rain there were no warning signs, clay and stones on the road, and a broken bridge wall. Unmanaged Council roadworks made a dangerous road far worse.
1 of 11
Councillor Máirín McGrath seconded the motion against a universal 60 km/h limit.
14 October 2024: Motion 2861 asked that the new 60 km/h rural default "not be universal across this County, but apply only in areas deemed necessary by this Council". Council engineers found no road they could recommend to stay at 80 km/h.
Full Council minutes, 14 October 2024, pp. 12–15
1 of 11
James Swords is the Council's District Engineer for this district.
The family asks him and the Council: who managed the roadworks at Killardry, who received the January 2025 inspection, and why were there no warning signs?
District Engineer: Cahir–Cashel Municipal District minutes, 26 May 2025 and 25 May 2026
1 of 11
The record is kept here.
Each photograph and document on these sites carries its source. Factual record. No finding of causation or responsibility is made here.
Road Death Tipp Road Death Tipp Tipperary road deaths — remembrance and records Remembrance and the official records, county by year. Working annual total. Not a count of points on the map. Open the map Partial map coverage. No ages shown. Explore → Partial map coverage. No ages shown.
Cahir–Cashel road statistics Cahir–Cashel Deadly place to drive ↗ × Cahir–Cashel road statistics Road statistics · sourced comparison Cahir–Cashel: 3.03× the national road-death rate 1 January 2018–31 December 2023 (six complete calendar years) . In the full Tipperary–Cahir–Cashel Municipal District, including its rural areas, the derived annualized rate was 8.61 people killed per 100,000 residents , compared with 2.84 nationally . This is an area comparison relative to population, not a personal likelihood. This page uses the full municipal district, not the populations of Cahir and Cashel towns. The linked road-deaths map and record has broader coverage and a different purpose. The headline figures 23 people killed in 21 fatal-collision records in the district 8.61 annualized people killed per 100,000 residents 3.03× the State rate on this population basis 36.5% of County Tipperary’s deaths and 26.5% of its population; the district rate was 37.6% above the county rate. District results The district’s fixed Census 2022 population is 44,532 . The 23 people comprised 11 drivers, 5 passengers, 5 pedestrians, 2 motorcyclists . They were not all drivers. Annual district deaths were 6, 4, 1, 3, 3, 6 from 2018 to 2023. Scroll horizontally to read this table. Five Tipperary municipal districts District 2022 population Fatal-collision records People killed People killed per 100,000 per year Clonmel 25,003 10 13 8.67 Tipperary–Cahir–Cashel 44,532 21 23 8.61 Carrick-on-Suir 20,191 7 7 5.78 Nenagh 40,879 11 12 4.89 Thurles 37,290 8 8 3.58 Scroll horizontally to read this table. Annual people killed Year Tipperary–Cahir–Cashel County Tipperary State 2018 6 10 134 2019 4 13 140 2020 1 7 141 2021 3 10 132 2022 3 7 152 2023 6 16 179 County comparison National baseline: the Republic of Ireland recorded 878 people killed across a fixed Census 2022 population of 5,149,139 , an annualized rate of 2.84 per 100,000 residents over these six years. Tipperary recorded 63 people killed , a rate of 6.25 , ranking #2 of 26 counties behind Monaghan (6.38). Tipperary’s rate was 2.20 times the national rate. Scroll horizontally to read this table. All 26 counties, ranked by annualized rate; the CSO county aggregate does not supply mapped source-record counts Rank County 2022 population People killed Fatal-collision records People killed per 100,000 per year 1 Monaghan 65,288 25 — 6.38 2 Tipperary 167,895 63 — 6.25 3 Donegal 167,084 53 — 5.29 4 Roscommon 70,259 22 — 5.22 5 Louth 139,703 41 — 4.89 6 Cavan 81,704 23 — 4.69 7 Mayo 137,970 38 — 4.59 8 Offaly 83,150 22 — 4.41 9 Kerry 156,458 41 — 4.37 10 Kilkenny 104,160 27 — 4.32 11 Leitrim 35,199 9 — 4.26 12 Longford 46,751 11 — 3.92 13 Westmeath 96,221 22 — 3.81 14 Clare 127,938 29 — 3.78 15 Meath 220,826 49 — 3.70 16 Sligo 70,198 15 — 3.56 17 Limerick 209,536 44 — 3.50 18 Wexford 163,919 34 — 3.46 19 Galway 277,737 49 — 2.94 20 Carlow 61,968 9 — 2.42 21 Cork 584,156 83 — 2.37 22 Laois 91,877 12 — 2.18 23 Waterford 127,363 15 — 1.96 24 Wicklow 155,851 18 — 1.92 25 Kildare 247,774 25 — 1.68 26 Dublin 1,458,154 99 — 1.13 A higher district comparator Boyle Municipal District, County Roscommon, recorded 15 people killed in 14 source records from a population of 24,421: 10.24 per 100,000 , about 19% higher than Tipperary–Cahir–Cashel. This is not a claim that Boyle is Ireland’s worst district; 11 districts were screened in this targeted comparison. Clonmel’s 8.67 rate is marginally higher than Cahir–Cashel’s 8.61; the largest raw count is not the highest district rate. Public council minutes: 2024–2026 These later public records are separate from the 2018–2023 statistical comparison. They record requests, responses and planned work—not findings of causation or proof that work was completed. 2025-05-26 James Swords: recorded response to a safety request The minutes record Councillor John O’Heney asking for safety measures following a recent tragic incident. James Swords is listed as District Engineer present; the response is attributed to that role. Limit: The minute does not name the bridge or specify a parapet repair. It does not say that Gardaí were to design or direct a bridge repair. there is an ongoing Gardai investigation into the incident and if there are any recommendations from the report it will be implemented. Excerpt from the minutes, not a verbatim speech transcript. Official minutes — attendance and District Engineer, PDF p. 1 — Officials Present; James Swords, District Engineer Official minutes — District Engineer’s report, PDF p. 5 — Item 3.4, District Engineer’s Report Official minutes — recorded response, PDF p. 6 — Item 3.4, District Engineer’s Report 2024-10-14 Máirín McGrath seconded the default-speed-limit motion Motion 2861 was proposed by Cllr Niall Dennehy and seconded by Cllr Máirín McGrath, a Cahir LEA member. The full County Council recorded unanimous agreement. The motion sought selective application of the new default limits, rather than universal application across the county. Limit: This was not a motion introducing a blanket 80-to-60 reduction. The December clarification below records the legal-advice referral. Official October minutes — Motion 2861, PDF p. 12 — Item 8.2, Notice of Motion Ref. 2861 Official October minutes — unanimous outcome, PDF p. 15 — Notice of Motion Ref. 2861 outcome Official Council AGM minutes — elected-area roles, PDF p. 2 — Item 2.1, elected members by electoral area 2024-12-09 Council clarification and legal advice The minutes record Chief Executive Sinéad Carr acknowledging support for Motion 2861, while explaining that legal advice was being sought on whether a plenary motion could supersede national legislation. The October minutes were to be amended to reflect that clarification. Limit: This does not establish a road-specific exception or a suspension of national rules. Official December minutes — clarification, PDF p. 2 — Item 3.1, Matters Arising on October minutes 2025-01-13 80-to-60 implementation and weather-delayed signs The minutes record 7 February 2025 as the commencement date for the rural-local-road default reduction from 80 to 60 km/h. They also record severe weather delaying sign-installation work and distinguish a later, wider Phase 2 review. Limit: This is a dated implementation note, not proof of the limit or weather at any individual crash site. Official January minutes — Speed Limit Review, PDF p. 11 — Item 7.1, Roads, Transportation, Health & Safety 2026-05-25 477 district bridges; 14 applications; three funded The District Engineer reported €1 million in county bridge funding, 477 bridges in the district, applications for 14 bridges requiring work and funding for three. Limit: The minute does not establish whether Killardry was among the 14; funding is not proof of completed work. Official May 2026 minutes — bridge funding, PDF p. 6 — Item 3.6, District Engineer’s Report 2026-05-25 Temporary measures considered at Rehill Bridge Following Cllr Máirín McGrath’s request for urgent rehabilitation, the District Engineer reported that Rehill tender documents were nearly complete and temporary measures were being considered to reopen the bridge, with completion hoped for by the end of that week. Limit: This records a plan and expectation, not verified completion. Official May 2026 minutes — Rehill Bridge, PDF p. 6 — Item 3.6, District Engineer’s Report The earlier bridge inspection The family’s published summary of Council inspection record TY-L3151-B-010 reports “Significant Damage” on 21 January 2025 and records downstream capping as “partly removed”. That inspection predates both the 24 April 2025 collision and the 26 May 2025 meeting response. Limit: This is a summary of a Council record held on file, not the original report online. The records checked do not establish whether or when James Swords personally received or read the inspection report. Published family summary of the Council inspection record When was the inspection circulated to the district engineering team, and what action was recorded? Further accountability research Read the full sourced record on the primary statistics page . Representatives Engineering Payments Road budgets Crash coverage Weather Surfaces and works Exposure comparisons Method and limits People killed ÷ fixed 2022 population ÷ 6 years × 100,000. Populations are fixed Census 2022 references. Counts concern collision locations, not resident addresses; the result is not a rate per journey or vehicle-kilometre. Current 2024 reference boundaries are applied retrospectively. The series is provisional and subject to revision. The figures do not establish why crashes happened or measure road-maintenance spending. Return home · Open the broader road-deaths map and record Sources RSA SourceData — Map of Collisions source data — Fatal-collision source records, 2018–2023; mapped locations assigned to current reference districts. CSO ROA15 — Persons Killed and Injured — State and county people-killed totals, 2018–2023; provisional/revisable series. CSO ROA12 — All road users — Independent national cross-check of people-killed totals, 2018–2023. CSO Census 2022 Table 8.1 background notes — State and county 2022 population background. CSO FY108 — official statutory LEA population CSV — 2022 population basis and statutory LEA/district mapping. Tipperary County Council Adopted Budget 2024, Table 7 (PDF) — Five municipal-district populations labelled as based on Census 2022; physical page 20. Tailte Éireann 2024 statutory boundary dataset service — Checked 2024 Tailte Éireann statutory municipal-district boundary dataset service; current reference boundaries applied retrospectively. Irish Statute Book S.I. 631/2018 — Optional Boyle municipal-district/LEA mapping context. Download the five-district CSV · Download the 26-county CSV · Download the public JSON snapshot Factual record. No finding of causation or responsibility is made here.
Contact the family
If you have information about this road, this bridge, or the records on this site, you can write to Bronagh's family here.
