Skip to content

Factual record. No finding of causation or responsibility is made here.

PIECE THREE · L3101 · 24 APRIL 2025

Clay on the road

Clay on the road Council works, marked complete. An open bank touching the tarmac. An open drain. Irish law on soil, a working site, and no protection left for her.

For Bronagh English. Killardry Bridge, Kilmoyler, near Cahir. Shortly after 10pm. Heavy rain. Dark. White 2021 Ford Fiesta. Sole occupant.

The join. Wet clay from the open bank sitting on the tarmac. Nothing between that material and the turning surface. Family photograph; phone chrome removed. No post-crash cones.
The join. Wet clay from the open bank sitting on the tarmac. Nothing between that material and the turning surface. Family photograph; phone chrome removed. No post-crash cones.

The bank they left

Not a neighbouring farmer’s field. The bank meets the carriageway. Daylight photographs seven days after show cut earth, loose stone, and a verge opened to weather. Cones in other, uncropped later views belong to the post-crash closure — they were not there for her, and they are not shown here.

“An active council work site without barriers, working warning signs or illuminated cones.” Mike English — the worked stretch on the right-hand side, approaching the bridge in her direction of travel.

Left: earth and stone hard against the sealed edge. Right: the cut face, open to rain. 1 May 2025. No cones in these frames.
Left: earth and stone hard against the sealed edge. Right: the cut face, open to rain. 1 May 2025. No cones in these frames.
Left: earth and stone hard against the sealed edge. Right: the cut face, open to rain. 1 May 2025. No cones in these frames.
Left: earth and stone hard against the sealed edge. Right: the cut face, open to rain. 1 May 2025. No cones in these frames.

The open drain

The family describe the open drain as “not acceptable at any level.” The council’s Internal Review of 18 February 2026 says the only drainage activity on the L-3151 was cleaning roadside-verge inlets, with no specific drainage works on the bridge itself. Cleaning an inlet can restore flow. It can also leave a fresh erodible face and an open channel beside live traffic.

The bend. Disturbed verge on the left. The turn she had to make is ahead. No cone in this frame.
The bend. Disturbed verge on the left. The turn she had to make is ahead. No cone in this frame.

THEIR OWN SCHEDULE

Marked complete. Before she drove it. Tipperary County Council Road Management system, FOI 10526, items 6 and 8. Obtained 2026. Not a mystery contractor. The road authority’s own jobs on this stretch, marked done.

YearPlaceChainageWorkStatus
2018Killardry1780–2480Road Reconstruction / StrengtheningComplete
2025Kilmoyler to Kilmo…0–1802Resealing RSRComplete

The Killardry section begins at chainage 1780; the 2025 reseal reached chainage 1802. The council’s own works schedule records two resurfacing campaigns across the bridge section. Each adds material and raises the road; the parapet was never raised to match.

“The only drainage works that were carried out on the L-3151 consisted of inlets in the roadside verges being cleaned out. There were no specific drainage works carried out on the bridge itself.” Tipperary County Council Internal Review Decision, 18 February 2026 (FOI 174/25).

The 2025 roadworks on the L-3151 were described as to the northwest of the bridge location. That answer does not map the photographed bank, date the overnight arrangement, or show what protection was left for a driver after dark.

IRISH ROAD LAW

What the law says about leaving clay on a public road Irish law still distinguishes doing nothing from doing the work badly. A council that simply fails to repair a crumbling wall has historically not been liable in private law. A council that carries out works and leaves a new danger can be.

01 · WHOSE BANK

This is the council’s own work Roads Act 1993, s.13(2)

“It is a function of the county council to maintain and construct all local roads in its administrative area.” The L3101 is a local road. Tipperary County Council is the road authority. FOI 10526 records reconstruction here in 2018 — complete — and resealing in 2025 — complete. Verge inlets cleaned. The exposed bank is not a neighbouring farmer’s field. It is the edge of the public road after the authority’s own operations.

02 · DOING THE WORK

Misfeasance — not doing nothing Gallagher v Leitrim County Council

“If, however, they do anything and do it in such a way as to create a danger they are liable.” Leaving a crumbling wall unrepaired is the old immunity — nonfeasance. Opening a verge, leaving clay where rain can carry it onto the turning surface, leaving an open drain beside traffic — that is a positive act. The immunity for doing nothing does not cover the works they did.

03 · CLAY ON A PUBLIC ROAD

Soil shall be kept off the carriageway Roads Act 1993, s.76(5)(b)

“The owner or occupier of any land adjacent to a public road shall take all reasonable steps to ensure that water, soil or other material is prevented from flowing or falling onto a public road from his land.” The Act’s own words: soil on a public road is a thing to be prevented. If the bank is adjacent land, the duty is shall — not may. If the bank is the road verge after council works, the authority opened the source. Either way the law treats clay on the tarmac as a hazard, not a detail.

04 · IMMEDIATE HAZARD

The authority may act at once Roads Act 1993, s.76(13)

“Where a road authority considers that water, soil or other material flowing or falling onto a public road from any land presents an immediate and serious hazard to persons using a public road, it may take immediate action to remove or reduce the hazard.” Heavy rain. An open bank. Clay on the turning surface of a 90° bend. The Act gives the road authority an immediate power — not a committee, not a programme year. The same section’s emergency power covers flooding, landslide or other emergency that is an immediate and serious hazard (s.76(3)(a)).

05 · MATERIAL THAT IS A HAZARD

The Act treats this as serious Roads Act 1993, s.13(10)(a)

“A person who, without lawful authority or the consent of a road authority, places or deposits any material or thing on a public road such that it is a hazard or potential hazard to persons using a public road, or obstructs or interferes with the safe use of a public road, shall be guilty of an offence.” The offence is for a person acting without the road authority’s authority. It is not a finding that the council committed it. It is the Oireachtas stating that material on a public road which is a hazard is a criminal matter for anyone else. The body that would prosecute that hazard is the same body whose works left the bank open.

06 · A WORKING SITE

Guard it. Light it. Sign it. Construction Regulations 2013, Regulation 97

“For any part of a road that is opened, excavated, broken up or obstructed by plant or equipment or by materials, adequate guarding and lighting, appropriate to the circumstances, is provided, and traffic signs are placed and maintained, as reasonably required for the safe guidance or direction of persons — including others, not only those at work.” Mike English: an active council work site without barriers, working warning signs or illuminated cones. Regulation 97 is a shall, not a guidance note. It protects road users as well as workers. It does not clock off when the crew goes home. Chapter 8 tells operators to clean construction mud off the surface and to check unattended sites in bad weather.

07 · THE PUBLIC ON THE WORKS

Duty to people who are not employees Safety, Health and Welfare at Work Act 2005, s.12

“Every employer shall manage and conduct his or her undertaking in such a way as to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, that in the course of the work being carried on, individuals at the place of work (not being his or her employees) are not exposed to risks to their safety, health or welfare.” The HSA guide notes that section 12 applies where the public have access to the place of work while work is in progress. She was the public. The place was the road. The work was theirs.

08 · IF THEY HAD ONLY LEFT IT

The duty to maintain was written. Never switched on. Civil Liability Act 1961, s.60(1) — never commenced

“A road authority shall be liable for damage caused as a result of their failure to maintain adequately a public road.” Section 60(5) includes any bridge, pipe, gulley, fence, railing or wall forming part of the road. Sixty-five years on the book. No government has commenced it. That is the immunity for doing nothing. It is not a licence to open a bank and leave clay on the road.

WHAT IT DELIVERED

Rain on an open bank. Clay on a blind bend. Then nine inches of wall. It was understood to have been raining heavily on the evening of the crash (Denis Wood Associates, 25 July 2025). The nearest Met Éireann gauge, Cahir (Toureen), 1.1 km away, recorded 21.5 mm that rainfall day (10am 24 April to 10am 25 April, Irish local time — includes hours after the collision), on ground already wet: 23.6 mm in the four days before. HSA guidance: muck on a public road can cause a motorist to lose control. This is the mechanism. It is not a reconstruction of her tyres. A nearby daily gauge does not measure the exact surface under her wheels. Colour in a later photograph does not, by itself, prove clay content or a deposit in her wheel path.

01 Works marked complete Reconstruction 2018. Reseal 2025. Verge inlets cleaned. The schedule says done.

02 The bank left open Exposed earth touching the tarmac. An open drain. No covering. No restraint.

03 Heavy rain that night 21.5 mm at Toureen. Four wet days already on the ground.

04 Clay on the turning surface Rain detaches. Runoff carries. The join in these photographs is the road she had to turn on.

05 A 90° bend she could not see No chevron. No advance warning. Posted 60. Wet. Dark.

06 The wall that did not hold Nine inches. 4.3 m to the river. Inspected 21 January 2025: Significant Damage. Ninety-three days.

The touch. This is the turning surface. The soil is already on it.
The touch. This is the turning surface. The soil is already on it.

Note on this record

This is a public explainer of the statutes and the recorded facts. It is not legal advice, and it is not a finding of fault, causation, or liability. The family’s solicitors are pursuing those questions. The council’s role — as client, contractor, road authority, or a combination — must be established, not assumed. Sources: family photographs of the bank (phone chrome removed; post-crash cones excluded); daylight photographs of 1 May 2025; Tipperary County Council Road Management works table (FOI 10526, items 6 and 8); Internal Review Decision, 18 February 2026 (FOI 174/25); Met Éireann gauge records as published by the family; Denis Wood Associates, 25 July 2025; Roads Act 1993; Civil Liability Act 1961 s.60; Construction Regulations 2013, Regulation 97; Safety, Health and Welfare at Work Act 2005, s.12; Gallagher v Leitrim County Council; O’Riordan v Clare County Council [2021] IECA 267. Full family record: bronaghenglish.com · killardrybridge.com.

Download the piece (PDF)

Road Death Tipp Road Death Tipp Tipperary road deaths — remembrance and records Remembrance and the official records, county by year. Working annual total. Not a count of points on the map. Open the map Partial map coverage. No ages shown. Explore → Partial map coverage. No ages shown.
Cahir–Cashel road statistics Cahir–Cashel Deadly place to drive ↗ × Cahir–Cashel road statistics Road statistics · sourced comparison Cahir–Cashel: 3.03× the national road-death rate 1 January 2018–31 December 2023 (six complete calendar years) . In the full Tipperary–Cahir–Cashel Municipal District, including its rural areas, the derived annualized rate was 8.61 people killed per 100,000 residents , compared with 2.84 nationally . This is an area comparison relative to population, not a personal likelihood. This page uses the full municipal district, not the populations of Cahir and Cashel towns. The linked road-deaths map and record has broader coverage and a different purpose. The headline figures 23 people killed in 21 fatal-collision records in the district 8.61 annualized people killed per 100,000 residents 3.03× the State rate on this population basis 36.5% of County Tipperary’s deaths and 26.5% of its population; the district rate was 37.6% above the county rate. District results The district’s fixed Census 2022 population is 44,532 . The 23 people comprised 11 drivers, 5 passengers, 5 pedestrians, 2 motorcyclists . They were not all drivers. Annual district deaths were 6, 4, 1, 3, 3, 6 from 2018 to 2023. Scroll horizontally to read this table. Five Tipperary municipal districts District 2022 population Fatal-collision records People killed People killed per 100,000 per year Clonmel 25,003 10 13 8.67 Tipperary–Cahir–Cashel 44,532 21 23 8.61 Carrick-on-Suir 20,191 7 7 5.78 Nenagh 40,879 11 12 4.89 Thurles 37,290 8 8 3.58 Scroll horizontally to read this table. Annual people killed Year Tipperary–Cahir–Cashel County Tipperary State 2018 6 10 134 2019 4 13 140 2020 1 7 141 2021 3 10 132 2022 3 7 152 2023 6 16 179 County comparison National baseline: the Republic of Ireland recorded 878 people killed across a fixed Census 2022 population of 5,149,139 , an annualized rate of 2.84 per 100,000 residents over these six years. Tipperary recorded 63 people killed , a rate of 6.25 , ranking #2 of 26 counties behind Monaghan (6.38). Tipperary’s rate was 2.20 times the national rate. Scroll horizontally to read this table. All 26 counties, ranked by annualized rate; the CSO county aggregate does not supply mapped source-record counts Rank County 2022 population People killed Fatal-collision records People killed per 100,000 per year 1 Monaghan 65,288 25 — 6.38 2 Tipperary 167,895 63 — 6.25 3 Donegal 167,084 53 — 5.29 4 Roscommon 70,259 22 — 5.22 5 Louth 139,703 41 — 4.89 6 Cavan 81,704 23 — 4.69 7 Mayo 137,970 38 — 4.59 8 Offaly 83,150 22 — 4.41 9 Kerry 156,458 41 — 4.37 10 Kilkenny 104,160 27 — 4.32 11 Leitrim 35,199 9 — 4.26 12 Longford 46,751 11 — 3.92 13 Westmeath 96,221 22 — 3.81 14 Clare 127,938 29 — 3.78 15 Meath 220,826 49 — 3.70 16 Sligo 70,198 15 — 3.56 17 Limerick 209,536 44 — 3.50 18 Wexford 163,919 34 — 3.46 19 Galway 277,737 49 — 2.94 20 Carlow 61,968 9 — 2.42 21 Cork 584,156 83 — 2.37 22 Laois 91,877 12 — 2.18 23 Waterford 127,363 15 — 1.96 24 Wicklow 155,851 18 — 1.92 25 Kildare 247,774 25 — 1.68 26 Dublin 1,458,154 99 — 1.13 A higher district comparator Boyle Municipal District, County Roscommon, recorded 15 people killed in 14 source records from a population of 24,421: 10.24 per 100,000 , about 19% higher than Tipperary–Cahir–Cashel. This is not a claim that Boyle is Ireland’s worst district; 11 districts were screened in this targeted comparison. Clonmel’s 8.67 rate is marginally higher than Cahir–Cashel’s 8.61; the largest raw count is not the highest district rate. Public council minutes: 2024–2026 These later public records are separate from the 2018–2023 statistical comparison. They record requests, responses and planned work—not findings of causation or proof that work was completed. 2025-05-26 James Swords: recorded response to a safety request The minutes record Councillor John O’Heney asking for safety measures following a recent tragic incident. James Swords is listed as District Engineer present; the response is attributed to that role. Limit: The minute does not name the bridge or specify a parapet repair. It does not say that Gardaí were to design or direct a bridge repair. there is an ongoing Gardai investigation into the incident and if there are any recommendations from the report it will be implemented. Excerpt from the minutes, not a verbatim speech transcript. Official minutes — attendance and District Engineer, PDF p. 1 — Officials Present; James Swords, District Engineer Official minutes — District Engineer’s report, PDF p. 5 — Item 3.4, District Engineer’s Report Official minutes — recorded response, PDF p. 6 — Item 3.4, District Engineer’s Report 2024-10-14 Máirín McGrath seconded the default-speed-limit motion Motion 2861 was proposed by Cllr Niall Dennehy and seconded by Cllr Máirín McGrath, a Cahir LEA member. The full County Council recorded unanimous agreement. The motion sought selective application of the new default limits, rather than universal application across the county. Limit: This was not a motion introducing a blanket 80-to-60 reduction. The December clarification below records the legal-advice referral. Official October minutes — Motion 2861, PDF p. 12 — Item 8.2, Notice of Motion Ref. 2861 Official October minutes — unanimous outcome, PDF p. 15 — Notice of Motion Ref. 2861 outcome Official Council AGM minutes — elected-area roles, PDF p. 2 — Item 2.1, elected members by electoral area 2024-12-09 Council clarification and legal advice The minutes record Chief Executive Sinéad Carr acknowledging support for Motion 2861, while explaining that legal advice was being sought on whether a plenary motion could supersede national legislation. The October minutes were to be amended to reflect that clarification. Limit: This does not establish a road-specific exception or a suspension of national rules. Official December minutes — clarification, PDF p. 2 — Item 3.1, Matters Arising on October minutes 2025-01-13 80-to-60 implementation and weather-delayed signs The minutes record 7 February 2025 as the commencement date for the rural-local-road default reduction from 80 to 60 km/h. They also record severe weather delaying sign-installation work and distinguish a later, wider Phase 2 review. Limit: This is a dated implementation note, not proof of the limit or weather at any individual crash site. Official January minutes — Speed Limit Review, PDF p. 11 — Item 7.1, Roads, Transportation, Health & Safety 2026-05-25 477 district bridges; 14 applications; three funded The District Engineer reported €1 million in county bridge funding, 477 bridges in the district, applications for 14 bridges requiring work and funding for three. Limit: The minute does not establish whether Killardry was among the 14; funding is not proof of completed work. Official May 2026 minutes — bridge funding, PDF p. 6 — Item 3.6, District Engineer’s Report 2026-05-25 Temporary measures considered at Rehill Bridge Following Cllr Máirín McGrath’s request for urgent rehabilitation, the District Engineer reported that Rehill tender documents were nearly complete and temporary measures were being considered to reopen the bridge, with completion hoped for by the end of that week. Limit: This records a plan and expectation, not verified completion. Official May 2026 minutes — Rehill Bridge, PDF p. 6 — Item 3.6, District Engineer’s Report The earlier bridge inspection The family’s published summary of Council inspection record TY-L3151-B-010 reports “Significant Damage” on 21 January 2025 and records downstream capping as “partly removed”. That inspection predates both the 24 April 2025 collision and the 26 May 2025 meeting response. Limit: This is a summary of a Council record held on file, not the original report online. The records checked do not establish whether or when James Swords personally received or read the inspection report. Published family summary of the Council inspection record When was the inspection circulated to the district engineering team, and what action was recorded? Further accountability research Read the full sourced record on the primary statistics page . Representatives Engineering Payments Road budgets Crash coverage Weather Surfaces and works Exposure comparisons Method and limits People killed ÷ fixed 2022 population ÷ 6 years × 100,000. Populations are fixed Census 2022 references. Counts concern collision locations, not resident addresses; the result is not a rate per journey or vehicle-kilometre. Current 2024 reference boundaries are applied retrospectively. The series is provisional and subject to revision. The figures do not establish why crashes happened or measure road-maintenance spending. Return home · Open the broader road-deaths map and record Sources RSA SourceData — Map of Collisions source data — Fatal-collision source records, 2018–2023; mapped locations assigned to current reference districts. CSO ROA15 — Persons Killed and Injured — State and county people-killed totals, 2018–2023; provisional/revisable series. CSO ROA12 — All road users — Independent national cross-check of people-killed totals, 2018–2023. CSO Census 2022 Table 8.1 background notes — State and county 2022 population background. CSO FY108 — official statutory LEA population CSV — 2022 population basis and statutory LEA/district mapping. Tipperary County Council Adopted Budget 2024, Table 7 (PDF) — Five municipal-district populations labelled as based on Census 2022; physical page 20. Tailte Éireann 2024 statutory boundary dataset service — Checked 2024 Tailte Éireann statutory municipal-district boundary dataset service; current reference boundaries applied retrospectively. Irish Statute Book S.I. 631/2018 — Optional Boyle municipal-district/LEA mapping context. Download the five-district CSV · Download the 26-county CSV · Download the public JSON snapshot Factual record. No finding of causation or responsibility is made here.

Contact the family

If you have information about this road, this bridge, or the records on this site, you can write to Bronagh's family here.

Sent only to the family. Not shared, not stored by any third party.

Explore the record